Brian Tyler Cohen unpacks fired FBI agents' lawsuit against Trump
Glenn Kirschner explains why the former agents want reinstatement as well as damages, in a fast-starting Legal Breakdown.
Why this story? The video opened at a pace of 306,445 views a day, 17 times a normal first day on this channel (17,898).
Fired FBI agents sue Trump, Blanche, Patel
Things we can learn from the video
Press to jump
- 0:00Nine former FBI agents have sued Trump, Blanche, Patel and the Department of Justice.
- 0:10Kirschner says the complaint alleges retaliation for the agents' work on Trump's classified documents case.
- 5:16The plaintiffs seek reinstatement, back pay, compensatory damages and a declaration that their terminations were unconstitutional.
- 10:50Kirschner argues that discovery could expose Patel to difficult questioning under oath.
What are the fired FBI agents asking a court to do? Getting their jobs back is a central demand, Glenn Kirschner explains in Brian Tyler Cohen News's "Fired FBI agents sue Trump, Blanche, Patel."
The Legal Breakdown segment examines a lawsuit brought by nine former agents against Donald Trump, Todd Blanche, Kash Patel and the Department of Justice. Kirschner says the complaint alleges the agents were unlawfully fired in retaliation for their work on Trump's classified documents case.
The discussion drew about 220,000 views in thirteen hours, already far beyond the channel's usual full-day audience for a regular video. Its comment section also exceeded the channel's usual first-day volume several times over.
Cohen moves the conversation from the alleged retaliation to what a court could actually award. Kirschner explains that the plaintiffs seek a declaration that their terminations violated the Constitution, reinstatement, back pay and compensatory damages. "They are seeking to have the court find that the Constitution was violated," he says.
Cohen also asks about the workplace the agents would return to. Later, Kirschner turns to discovery, the pretrial process through which parties seek evidence. He argues that sworn questioning could put Patel in a difficult position. That is his assessment of how the litigation might unfold, not an outcome the court has reached.
Published on Trari
Where next?
- Channel
- Brian Tyler Cohen News
- Subscribers
- 307,000 ▲ 2,000 this week
- Channel views, last 7 days
- 858,955
- Channel views, pace per day
- 29,981 (on a normal day: 153,554)
- Video published
- October 18, 2026
- Video views so far
- 217,448 (less than a day online)
- Video views, pace per day
- 306,445
The numbers
The lawsuit discussion passed the channel's usual full-day views well before its first day was complete. Comments were also substantially above the usual first-day total.



